An Assessment of the Impacts of Renewable Energy Policies on the Thai Electricity Generation Sector

Supannika Wattana, Buncha Wattana

Abstract


This paper aims to assess the implications of an increased electricity generation from renewable energy on the Thai electricity generation sector with a particular focus on energy security and CO2 emissions mitigation potentials. For this purpose, three scenarios (REF, AEDP2015 and AEDP2018), developed in this paper, represent penetration levels of electricity generated from renewable energy. The implications have been analyzed through the application of LEAP model for the period 2018–2037. The analyses revealed that high penetrations of renewable energy would have positive impacts on the Thai electricity generation from several perspectives including improving the diversification of electricity supply, decreasing fossil fuel imports for generating electricity, less dependency on fossil fuel, environmentally friendly power generation, utilizing agricultural wastes, and build-up of local capabilities in electricity generation. Moreover, the energy transition due to disruptive innovations would make renewable energy more attractive. However, the transition would raise several challenges for the Thai electricity system, for example, capital-intensive investment, centralized electricity system, traditional regulatory framework and a lack of social involvement. In order to address the transitional challenges, the Thai government has initiated a number of policies including the upgrade of the grid to smart grid, the development of energy storage and the revision of the regulations to support local energy business. In addition to the initiation of the government’s policies, this paper suggests that a structural change in the form of a separation between generation and transmission functions of the state electric utility, the development of new infrastructure and network regulation, and collaborations among stakeholders by increasing more participation and governance as well as aligning regulatory arrangement taking into account more on social objectives would provide a robust pathway to efficiently integrate renewable energy into the Thai electricity system.

Keywords


Alternative Energy Development Plan; electricity sector; LEAP model; renewable energy; Thailand

Full Text:

PDF

References


EPPO. 2019a. Electricity consumption for the whole country: 2006–2018. Energy Policy and Planning, Ministry of Energy, Bangkok.

DEDE. 2019a. Energy balance of Thailand: 2012-2018, annual reports. Department of Alternative Energy Development and Efficiency, Ministry of Energy, Bangkok.

EPPO. 2019b. CO2 emission in power generation: 2006–2018. Energy Policy and Planning, Ministry of Energy, Bangkok.

DEDE. 2015. Alternative Energy Development Plan (AEDP2015). Department of Alternative Energy Development and Efficiency, Ministry of Energy, Bangkok.

DEDE. 2019b. Summary of the public hearing on the draft of the Alternative Energy Development Plan 2018 (AEDP2018). Department of Alternative Energy Development and Efficiency, Ministry of Energy, Bangkok, 24 Jul.

DEDE. 2011. Thailand energy situation: 2000-2011, annual reports. Department of Alternative Energy Development and Efficiency, Ministry of Energy, Bangkok.

DEDE. 2018. Thailand Alternative Energy Situation: 2018. Department of Alternative Energy Development and Efficiency, Ministry of Energy, Bangkok.

Precharjarn S. and P. Prasertsri. 2010. Thailand Biofuels Annual 2010. USDA Foreign Agricultural Services, Gain Report Number TH0098, approved by Orestes Vasquez.

DEDE. 2008. Renewable Energy Development Plan (2008–2022). Department of Alternative Energy Development and Efficiency, Ministry of Energy, Bangkok.

DEDE. 2004. Electric Power in Thailand: 2004. Department of Alternative Energy Development and Efficiency, Ministry of Energy, Bangkok.

DEDE. 2012. Alternative Energy Development Plan (2012–2021). Department of Alternative Energy Development and Efficiency, Bangkok.

Ringkjob H.K., Huagan P.M. and Solbrekke I.M. 2018. A review of modelling tools for energy and electricity systems with large shares of variable renewables. Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews 96: 440–459.

Bhattacharyya S.C. and G.R. Timilsina. 2010. A review of energy system models. International Journal of Energy Sector Management 4(4): 494–518.

SEI. 2018. Long-range Energy Alternative Planning (LEAP) system: training exercises. Stockholm Environment Institute, Stockholm.

Sritong N., Promjiraprawat K. and Limmeechokchai B., 2014. CO2 mitigation in the road transport sector in Thailand: Analysis of energy efficiency and bioenergy. Energy Procedia 52: 131-141.

Kemausuor F., Nygaard I. and Mackenzie G., 2015. Prospects for bioenergy use in Ghana using long-range energy alternatives planning model. Energy 93: 672-682.

Islas J., Manzini F., and Masera O., 2007. A prospective study of bioenergy use in Mexico. Energy 32: 2306-2320.

Suganthi L. and A.A. Samuel. 2012. Energy models for demand forecasting—A review. Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews 16: 1223-1240.

Pagnarith K. and B. Limmeechokchai. 2009. Biomass and solar energy for rural electrification and CO2 mitigation in Cambodia. International Journal of Renewable Energy 4: 25-34.

Emodi N.V., Emodib C.C., Murthy G.P. and Emodi A.S.A., 2017. Energy policy for low carbon development in Nigeria: A LEAP model application. Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews 68: 247–261.

Alam J.B., Wadud Z., Alam J.B. and Polak J.W., 2013. Energy demand and economic consequences of transport policy. International Journal of Environmental Science and Technology 10:1075–1082.

Ates S.A., 2015. Energy efficiency and CO2 mitigation potential of the Turkish iron and steel industry using the LEAP. Energy 90: 417-428.

EPPO. 2018. Power Development Plan (PDP2018). Energy Policy and Planning Office, Ministry of Energy, Bangkok.

EPPO. 2015. Power Development Plan (PDP2015). Energy Policy and Planning Office, Ministry of Energy, Bangkok.

IEA. 2013. Southeast Asia energy outlook: World energy outlook special report, International Energy Agency, Paris.

Sorapipatana C., 2013. An assessment of energy security in Thailand’s power generation. Final Report submitted to the National Science and Technology Development Agency (NSTDA). (In Thai)

Siritiprussamee P., Suwannarat W. and Dulyarittirong R., 2014. Analysis of Thailand electricity demand pattern. Journal of Environmental Management 10(1): 1–18. (In Thai)

EGAT. 2018. Electricity Peak Demand of National Grid. Electricity Generating Authority of Thailand, Nonthaburi. [On-line serial], Retrieved July 1, 2019 from the World Wide Web: https://www.egat.co.th/index.php?option=com_content&view=article&id=348&Itemid=116.

Vivoda V., 2010. Evaluating energy security in the Asia-Pacific region: A novel methodological approach. Energy Policy 38: 5258–5263.

Sovacool B.K., 2011. Evaluating energy security in the Asia pacific: Towards a more comprehensive approach. Energy Policy 39: 7472–7479.

Jahansson B. 2013. Security aspects of future renewable energy systems – A short overview. Energy: 598–605.

UNDP. 2004. World Energy Assessment: Overview 2004 Update, United Nations Development Program, New York.

ESCAP. 2008. Energy Security and Sustainable Development in Asia and the Pacific, Economic and Social Commission for Asia and the Pacific, Bangkok.

DEDE. 2019c. Electric Power in Thailand: 1980–2006. Department of Alternative Energy Development and Efficiency, Bangkok.

IRENA. 2020. Power System Organizational Structures for the Renewable Energy Era. International Renewable Energy Agency, Abu Dhabi.

IRENA. 2018. Power System Flexibility for the Energy Transition Part 1: Overview for Policy Makers. International Renewable Energy Agency, Abu Dhabi.

Lennon B., Dunphy N.P., and Sanvicente E., 2019. Community acceptability and the energy transition: a citizens’ perspective. Energy, Sustainability and Society 9(35): 1–18.

EGAT. 2019. MOE - EGAT discuss Thai energy in the disruptive era, Electricity Generating Authority of Thailand, Nonthaburi.

Wattana S. 2010. Electricity industry reform in Thailand: A comprehensive review. PhD Thesis, University of Technology, Sydney, Australia (unpublished).

Aemocha P. 2019. Renewables pending unless Thailand implements energy decentralization. Prachathai, 20 June, [On-line serial], Retrieved January 10, 2020 from the World Wide Web: https://prachatai.com/english/node/8105.

Greacen C. and S. Bijoor. 2007. Decentralized energy in Thailand: An emerging light. World Rivers Review 22 (2): 3–4.